Sunday, October 3, 2010
Saturday, August 7, 2010
GITZO TRAVELER CARBON FIBRE TRIPOD - GT1541T and BALL HEAD - PHOTOCLAM33NS
Have a heavy aluminium Manfrotto setup, the 190XPROB and the 486RC2. Decided a tripod that stays at home is useless, and the sharpest lens money can buy is a TRIPOD that you can bring with you anywhere. Thus the justification of purchasing the Gitzo tripod you see below and also the GC1201T tripod bag for good measure. Decided to purchase the PhotoClam ball head instead of the Markins Q3T because the legs can be folded fully and not obstructed.
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Think Tank products, huge fan!!!
Have been on a buying spree, fell in love with Think Tank products... a few items I have accumulated over a 2 month period
| TT STREETWALKER |
| TT UD 10 |
| TT UD 30 |
| TT UD 70 PRO |
| TT AIRPORT INTERNATIONAL V2.0 |
| TT AIR INT V2.0 |
| TT AIR INT V2.0 WHEEL |
| TT AIR INT CABLE LOCK |
| TT AIR INT V2.0 LOCK |
| TT PEE WEE PIXEL ROCKET |
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Crayfish@Nins Bin, Kaikoura
As it was going to be long weekend with Labour Day coming Monday, we decided to take a leisurely drive to nearby Kaikoura. It was a very pleasant 2.30 hr drive in very sunny and cool spring weather (15degC).
We arrived at Nins Bin around 11am. It is located 20kms north of Kaikoura, just next to the State Highway 1. Easily spotted, don't be fooled by Kay's Crays just about 200metres before you arrive at Nins Bin (heading north).
The place was already a hive of activity with tourists and locals selecting their object of desire. Here, price of each crayfish is clearly written on its tail, ranging from NZ$45 to 80. You can choose to have it hot (extra $1), with grlic & butter sauce (extra $3). A dozen mussels will set you back NZ$12. They also accept cash, EFTPOS, visa or mastercard, so no worries if you decide to buy the whole lot of crays, I know I was tempted!
We selected a decent sized crayfish ($68) and had it hot complete with garlic and butter sauce. It arrived on our table in about 10 minutes complete with sizable slices of lemon. It was pure delight digging into the fresh crayfish. The meat was juciy and succulent, without smelling fishy at all. I like the meat slightly tough and chewy, it had a good 'bite' feel to it. It was the most enjoyable food experience, with the al fresco table layout, panoramic views of the sea and fresh crays at your mercy!
All in all, a thoroughly fantastic meal, highly recommended to all. Worth the trip there just for the crays, although we stopped in Kaikoura to view the fur seal colony.
Monday, October 12, 2009
To FX or not to FX?

With all the hype surrounding full frame (Nikon calls its FF format FX), I was contemplating jumping to FX. But after evaluating my lens collection and my shooting style, I decided that FX was just not for me, yet.
Lenswise, I have a few DX format lenses, namely the 17-55 2.8, 18-200 VR, 10-20 HSM. The 18-200 VR and 10-20 HSM have always been my pair of travel lenses, with the 18-200 stuck onto my d40 and the 10-20 coupled onto my d80. Changing to FX, means I would have to buy the excellent, bloody expensive, not to mention can't screw on a filter, Nikon 14-24. Also, I would loose the flexibility of the 18-200 VR, not forgetting the weight penalty, with using the D700 and FX lenses.
Next argument, I would hate to loose the telephoto end due to the 1.5x crop of the DX sensor if I were to jump to FX. Currently, I'm getting an effective focal length of 600mm with my nikon 80-400VR. This allows me to do birding and wildlife photography. In FX, 400mm would remain 400mm.
Some might argue that FX goes wider than DX. True, but it is only 1mm comparing my 10-20 (effective focal length 15mm-30mm FX) to the 14-24mm.
Lastly, I don't do too much low-light photography. I fully agree that FX shines at high ISOs. This would be very useful for event photography, concerts, places where flash photography is banned, etc,etc.
I would foresee myself jumping to FX if d700 costs the same as the d300, or if I'm more seriously involved in low-light/event photography.
Hope this short post would help you decide if jumping to FX would be worth it.
Labels:
dx,
FX,
nikon,
tekapo church of the good shepherd
Saturday, October 10, 2009
NIKON 17-55 2.8 AF-S
My workhorse lens. Good in lowlight and fast enough for indoor photography. Colour are sharp and contrast is fantastic. Slightly heavy and has a humongous hood, excellent value. bought off TradeMe at NZ$1200. Built like a tank but not as solid as old-school Nikkors. Recommended if you need a zoom for low-light situations.
NIKON 80-400 AF VR
SIGMA 10-20 HSM
NIKON 18-200 VR
TAMRON 90 2.8 SP Di II Macro
SIGMA 70-200 2.8 HSM
NIKON 50 1.8 AF-D
NIKON 85 1.4 AF-D
ASICS Cumulus 11 - Mens
Asics Cumulus 10 - Women
Asics Gel 3000
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
